Friday, September 30, 2022
PRESIDENT MUSEVENI ENTICED TO LAUNCH PROTEA NAGURU SKYZ HOTEL FIVE YEARS PAST DUE
NEXT MEDIA SERVICES APPLAUDED FOR DEMYSTIFYING THE MASS COMMUNICATION TOOLS OF TRADE
Museveni officially launches Next Media Park, commends management for wealth and job creation
watchdoguganda.com, September 30, 2022 | President Yoweri Museveni has encouraged Ugandans to use the opportunities created by the National Resistance Movement (NRM) government to engage in activities that create wealth for socio-economic transformation.
File Photo/Courtesy: President Yoweri Museveni (in lead) flanked by Kin Kariisa, the Group Chief Executive Officer, Next Media Sevices, while being ushered to officially launch the Next Media Park. |
YouTube Video | Ben – LIVE | Museveni launches Next Media Park, the home of NBS Television, Nile Post, NBS Sport & Sanyuka TV ππΎ
While launching the Next Media Park located at Naguru Hill in Kampala, His Excellency the President said the policy of liberalization was aimed at among others things; bettering service delivery through wealth creation because the previous governments had not correctly analyzed how to create wealth and jobs.
YouTube Video | Next Media Uganda: Welcome to the Next Media Park ππΎ
Next Media Services is a multimedia company with a range of brands in Television, Radio and communications which include among others; NBS Television, Sanyuka TV, NBS Sport, Nile post, Salam TV and Next Radio and are employing over 500 Ugandans, mostly the youth.
H.E the President re-echoed the four (4) sectors of jobs and wealth creation namely; commercial agriculture, manufacturing/industries, services like communication and entertainment, transport, hospitality and the fourth one being Information Communication Technology-ICT which some Ugandans like Kin Kariisa, the group Chief Executive Officer of Next Media and colleagues have taken advantage of.
“So, therefore, those who are wasting our time talking about everything, this is the way to go. NRM has created all these opportunities. What the Kariisas have done is “Okulembeka”-to take opportunity and create wealth through service provision. And by creating wealth they have also created jobs. I want to salute Kariisa and his colleagues,” H.E Museveni said.
According to H.E the President, the past governments had monopolized some of these services like the business of hotels and transport but later they were given to the private people to run them both for efficiency but also as a signal for private investors to come in and build more.
He further noted that he stood his ground amidst a big cabinet debate to allow private media to operate in Uganda especially at a time when Light House Television, a Christian channel wanted to provide TV and radio services in Uganda.
“The debate was, if you lose the monopoly of information, the government will collapse! I said no I cannot collapse unless I had a heart problem in the first place. They would tell lies, I would answer them,” Gen.Museveni noted, adding that by that time they did believe that the government should not block/obstruct (okutarirana-in Lunyankore) the private sector but to give them freedom to move into these businesses including the media.
“By encouraging liberalization, you can see how much energy we have unleashed, like this group of Mr Kariisa and his colleagues. They have now come in because it’s a free space, you can come and start a private radio and a TV station. Both the law and the policy allow it,” H.E Museveni said.
On the issue of content, the President called upon media houses to promote Uganda and stop de-campaigning policies aimed at transforming the economy.
“I have not been watching NBS recently but I hope as Mr Kasumba has said, that they’re promoting Uganda, and if they are doing that, that’s very good,” Mr. Museveni noted.
He made mention of his initiative of adding value to coffee so that Uganda can earn more which was misunderstood and therefore received negative publicity from the media.
The President said the coffee business in the world is 460 billion US dollars but the coffee growing countries in the world, Uganda inclusive only share 25 billion US dollars of which only 2.5 billion US dollars is coming to Africa and Uganda is only sharing 800 billion US dollars.
“How can this be? Are there educated people in Africa? How can it be that Germany earns more from coffee than almost all the African countries combined?” Gen. Museveni wondered, adding that this undermines point No.5 of the NRM’s 10-point program of Building an economy which is integrated, independent and self-sustaining.
“This was our line to add value to coffee and textile. The shirt I’m putting on is produced from our cotton. So, therefore, its not just these assets, its is now the content of what the assets will be used for,” the President said.
According to the Next Media CEO Kin Kariisa, although the President has occasionally labeled the media rumor mongers, they’re determined to share the narrative and tell the Ugandan story.
“I could not allow foreign media to come here and tell us how to behave, dress and how our culture should be handled. We said let’s build our own media house to be able to shape our own future and narrative. We can do more to nature and transform this country,” Kin Kariisa said.
The Prime Minister Robinah Nabbanja, the Minister of state for investment Evelyn Anite and the Board Chairman Next Media Rogers Baguma also addressed the gathering.
In attendance, were among others; the Chief Justice of Uganda Alfonse Owiny-Dollo, Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs Norbert Mao, former Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi, the Titular head of Muslims in Uganda, Prince Kassim Nakibinge, the Executive Director Uganda Media Center Ofwono Opondo, KCCA ED Dorothy Kisaka and Presidential Advisor on Trade & Industry Amelia Kyambadde.
SUPPLEMENT
EUROPEAN UNION HEAD OF DIPLOMATIC MISSION TO EAST AFRICA ACKNOWLEDGES THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION CONFERRED ON SOVEREIGN STATES BY INTERNATIONAL LAW
EU Resolution not binding to Tanzania and Uganda, says Envoy
thecitizen.co.tz, Alex Mulanga, September 30, 2022 | The European Union (EU) head of delegation to Tanzania and the East African Community, Mr Manfredo Fanti, expressed the union’s standing in the ongoing construction of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline project (EACOP) impasse following the September 14 resolution by the EU Parliament condemning the project on claims of environmental concerns and negative effect to human life.
The interview was conducted by Mwananchi reporter Julius Mnganga and transcribed by The Citizen reporter Alex Malanga. Read on..
Question: The host governments and TotalEnergies have agreed to implement the project which the European Parliament opposes, how legally-binding is the resolution to the EU Parliament?
Answer: It is a political decision of the European Parliament, which is completely legitimate and within the European parliament, but they are not binding.
Local environmental authorities in both countries have confirmed that the project will not have any adverse impact. On the other hand, the EU Parliament says otherwise. Who should we trust?
The authorities in Tanzania and Uganda are perfectly free to continue with the project because these are sovereign states and they have the right to decide about their energy and development policies.
The same applies to TotalEnergies as an investor, the resolution itself does not have any impact directly on the decision of Total, which is a separate company.
I think that the intention of the resolution is to express the general concern of the EU for the environment and protection of the rights of people affected by this big project.
It is also important to consider the general message; which is respecting the environment and the rights of people.
And this is of course a reality and everybody agrees on it.
People who have been affected by this project have been relocated. Is there anything of critical concern?
Total and the governments have ensured that all people affected by the project received either compensation in form of money or a new house depending on the way they are affected by the project.
This is something objective which can be verified and TotalEnergies has presented the report in this regard.
However, transparency is really very key in order to show that everything is done according to good practices.
The EU Parliament played down reports by European companies that collaborated with local companies and authorities, do you think it is high time Africa relied on its local experts?
No, I would not say that. Nobody can do it alone. We need you, you need us in business, economic development, exchange of technology and exchange of products.
I think what we need is to increase these exchanges in a balanced way….It should not be an exploitation.
On the European Parliament’s resolution we should understand that political debate, especially in Europe, is not unusual.
The European Parliament attacking a private company or a certain group of interests is something common.
I think TotalEnergies has an opportunity to respond to the resolution and to show that everything has been done according to the rules and good practices.
Sometimes, Western countries come with reports that differ from those presented by local authorities. What seems to be the missing link?
I think what will be important especially on sensitive big projects like energy, which create big attention on climate and environment, is to have good communication strategy.
This means to share information even with political bodies, NGOs, etc. This is the best way to ensure that people do not feel suspicious about the way it is done.
Would continuing with the construction of EACOP affect diplomatic relations?
Not at all. The EU parliament is an independent institution of the EU, its members are elected by citizens and it has a political mandate.
So, the role of the parliament is partly separate from the role of council of ministers which determines the policies of the EU.
As I said before, the European Parliament has a political mandate. You should take the general message, but not consider it as a guiding point in our relations at all.
This is because, this is just one element of the much-wider relations between EU and Tanzania, Uganda, and Africa in general.
Do you think Europe has anything to lose if Tanzania and Uganda continue with the project?
No, this is also the message to the European Parliament that Tanzania and Uganda are free to continue with their energy and development policies.
TotalEnergies too, is free to continue with its business.
The meaning of the message is that there is a general expectation that Total will conduct its business together with its associates in line with rules on corporate social responsibility, respect for environment and so on.
I am sure Tanzania and Uganda too, will not be happy to have the pipeline which will be creating environmental problems.
Does your office play any role in feeding the European Parliament with information regarding EACOP?
The EU Parliament has its own source of information. We have been requested to provide some information about the project in Tanzania and especially about the situation NGOs are complaining about.
But the delegation itself does not have a fundamental role in the final deliberation of the EU Parliament because they are prepared by the internal administration of the European Parliament and submitted to the members of the Parliament.
Can you weigh the benefits and disadvantages of EACOP?
My own opinion is that the world needs energy. We buy oil, we buy gas and we are even buying coal, even from Tanzania
So, in my view, I think we should conduct all these businesses in the best possible way.
Many past experiences in various countries have shown that if we don’t pay sufficient attention to the protection of environment and protection of people affected by the projects then we are in deep trouble
Were you surprised by the European Parliament resolution?
I was not particularly surprised. I have a long career in the European Union behind me and have seen many of these situations.
As I said, the EU Parliament is a political body and inside the European Parliament we have different political trends and vision.
I think what is important is to put this kind of resolution in the general context of relations between EU and Tanzania and Uganda, in this case.
We have been enjoying good relations. The EU has increased its development cooperation with Tanzania for the last year compared to the past years.
One of the most important sectors in our cooperation is energy. We have invested around Euro 118 million in energy projects here in Tanzania.
There is a very deep relation, but in this relation there is also a political element. So, this is the theme you need to look at as the general framework.
Some European countries including Germany, Austria, Greece and Italy have gone back to coal-powered plants to generate energy. Why would that be fair but a crude oil pipeline between Tanzania and Uganda is bad?
Look, all of us are in difficult times. That is why there is a call to reduce gas emission and protect the environment to fight climate change. This implies less use of fossil fuels.
But we have this fact that with the Russia-Ukraine war, the energy situation in Europe has changed and we are now in a kind of emergency situation where we need to produce energy to have the economy running and also very simply to heat the houses of people.
So, I think generally, you are right, it is not coherent having the resolutions on EACOP and then buying coal. But the fact is that the world is facing a very complicated situation and there are different actions that we need to undertake but the final objective is clear that we have commonly agreed it is to reduce gas emission in order to fight climate change and on that I can say EU is a champion because of its policies.
With the effects of economic sanctions becoming increasingly unbearable for Africa, those who chose to condemn Russia are thinking of engaging it as a key trading partner. What’s your take on this?
The EU position has not changed. So, behaviour and policy action have not changed.
We firmly condemn the aggression of Russia against Ukraine. Millions of Ukraine people have been forced to flee their country, thousands of people, including children, have died.
We continue to support Ukraine. We hope that peace will prevail very soon. We will be ready to support any peace agreement.
But I don’t agree with the claims that the war continues because we are helping Ukraine, the fact is that the war continues because Russia continues with aggression and Ukraine on the other side continues to defend itself.
The ongoing war in Ukraine and the sanctions netted on Russia have disrupted the supply chain of some essential goods in the world. Don’t you think it’s high time that Africa went big with the exploitation of its own resources to reduce dependence on others?
Africa has a lot of energy resources particularly renewable energy and Africa should try as much as possible to develop these resources.
Tanzania is a good example because it is true that on one side we see EACOP, on the other side we see the use of solar energy, hydropower, etc.
This is very important in the strategy of this country---diversifying energy sources and using as much as possible renewable energy.
SUPPLEMENT
GEOPOLITICAL HEGEMONY TO BLAME FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE DOUBLE STANDARDS IN THE WAKE OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT
East Africa: European Union's Blatant Hypocrisy On Fossils Fuels in Banning EACOP but Funding the Baltic Pipe Project
allafrica.com, September 30, 2022, 08:11AM | The EU bile against the EACOP speaks volumes on the EU parliament's imperialism and neo-colonial attitudes by turning a blind eye to the Union's emissions, choosing to hypocritically shine a light on East Africa's emerging economies, Uganda and Tanzania.
Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine at the end of February sent energy markets reeling and prices surging.
The EACOP will convey crude oil from Kabaale - Hoima in Uganda to Tanzania's Chongoleani peninsula near Tanga port.
The EU bile against the EACOP, according to Tayebwa, speaks volumes about the EU parliament's imperialism and neo-colonial attitudes.
Global energy market disruptions
Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine at the end of February sent energy markets reeling and prices surging. Russia remains the largest oil and gas products exporter globally, and Africa is mainly affected by the resultant market disruptions.
The recent global oil market changes have inspired the search for alternatives. Countries have also resolved to fast-track existing oil and gas projects in Africa and beyond. The East African Crude Oil Pipeline Project (EACOP) is a crucial East African project.
File Photo/Courtesy: The East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline from Kabaale - Hoima in Uganda to Tanzania's Chongoleani peninsula near Tanga port. |
YouTube Video | Kabalega TV || EACOP ROUTE: The East African Crude Oil Pipeline Route from Hoima, Uganda to Tanzania. ππΎ
EACOP represents a 1,443km crude oil export pipeline. The pipeline will convey crude oil from Kabaale - Hoima in Uganda to Tanzania's Chongoleani peninsula near Tanga port. The pipeline's peak capacity will stand at 246,000 bbls/day.
The agreement for the project ensures that an Environmental Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) happens as per the International Finance Corporation (IFC) standards. The EACOP has also considered international best practices backed by primary biodiversity and feasibility studies.
EU's stance on EACOP is controversial and hypocritical
The European Union passed a resolution on September 14, 2022, calling for human rights and environmental protections as Uganda and Tanzania conceptualize the EACOP project. The EU resolution warns that the project threatens wetlands and water resources, a source of livelihood for fisherfolk, farmers, and tourism business owners.
YouTube Video | FRANCE 24 English: Uganda furious at EU parliament censure of mega oil project ππΎ
As per the resolution, the impacts and risks of the oil fields and pipeline infrastructure development already appear immense. The EU claims that the risks have been thoroughly recorded in various independent expert reports and community-based impact evaluations.
The resolution comes out as hypocritical and controversial. While Tanzania ensures the EACOP is human rights compliant, Uganda has termed the European Parliament's resolution against EACOP's construction as a neo-colonial stance against Uganda and Tanzania, independent and sovereign African countries.
Responding to the controversial resolution, Mr January Makamba, Tanzania's Energy minister, noted that the entire pipeline route has a design to scale down social and environmental impacts. Makamba further observes that the EACOP handling falls in line with all international regulations and laws on environmental safety and human rights protection.
Uganda's Thomas Tayebwa, the deputy speaker for parliament, slammed the EU for its excessive reliance on fossil fuels compared to Uganda and other African nations. Tayebwa termed the EU position as economic sabotage against the right of sovereign African countries to benefit from their oil and gas sectors.
YouTube Video | Thomas Tayebwa: EU Parliament should Stop interfering in the Uganda and Tanzania development of the Oil and Gas Projects ππΎ
The EU bile against the EACOP, according to Tayebwa, speaks volumes about the EU parliament's imperialism and neo-colonial attitudes, which he derides for turning a blind eye to the Union's emissions, choosing to hypocritically shine a light on East Africa's emerging economies, Uganda and Tanzania.
According to Mr Tayebwa, EACOP's prospective pollutant effect will only represent 0.5 per cent of global emissions. Ironically, the EU representing just 10 per cent of the global population, emits 20 per cent unfettered, and member nations have contemplated deepening fossil-fuel-related excavations unfettered.
Double standards by the European Union on the EACOP
What is good for the goose must also be good for the gander. However, the EU commission has commissioned the Baltic pipe project, somewhat similar to the EACOP. The Baltic Pipe project got inaugurated on September 27, 2022, at an opening ceremony in GoleniΓ³w, Poland.
The Trans-European Networks for Energy backs the energy project. The Baltic Pipe boosts the gas supply diversification of Central-Eastern Europe and the Baltic States. It introduces a new import route from the North Sea to the EU. The Baltic Pipe has remained a common interest project for the EU since 2013. The EU has pumped around €267 million in funding to complete the preliminary studies and construction works necessary for the Baltic pipe project.
Notably, apart from the Baltic pipe project, faced with energy shortages and rising costs for fuel and electricity, rich European countries have reverted to even dirtier fossil fuels. Some EU members have even resumed burning fuel oil to generate electricity. The rebirth of carbon-intensive energy indicates that when energy security and economic growth are threatened for Europe, security and development beat climate policies.
The EU's iron law against EACOP and other African projects
Political scientist Roger Pielke Jr. has labelled this approach by the EU the iron law. The current stance by Europe means energy security is again taking precedence, and climate commitments must wait. While this change makes sense in Central and Eastern Europe, it looks very different when viewed from Uganda or Tanzania.
One side of Europe's turnaround on energy founds on the need to diversify gas sources with an aggressive drive for long-term oil and gas contracts in Africa. This spell of interest in gas comes following many years of rich EU governments pressuring African countries to substitute fossil fuels for solar or wind power.
Some European governments have also pressured development institutions such as the World Bank to halt financing all fossil fuel projects. Sweden, Norway, and others recommend a total prohibition by 2024.
Paradoxically, the European Union has resolved that the ongoing energy emergency gives leeway to burn whichever fuel they desire. On the other hand, emerging economies lack that pass-through completely. For Africa, this stance looks like blatant hypocrisy--or worse.
In a September 20 statement, the independent pan-African NGO based in Banjul, in the Gambia, slammed the European resolution on EACOP perceived environmental and human rights concerns as a self-serving ploy and interference with African affairs.
Flawed European Union policies on African gas
As affluent nations would have it, "gas for me but not for thee" is more than simply bad optics. It is a poor policy. The EU has prioritised the West's energy access while pushing Africa to prioritize emission reductions. This move is counterproductive in achieving economic, geostrategic, and even climatic objectives.
The present hostility against Africa and EACOP, specifically over gas consumption, is entirely unwarranted. The continent's prosperity lies in low-cost renewables. Limited gas usage is for power backup, cooking, and a few businesses, such as fertilizer manufacturing. Uganda, Kenya, and Ethiopia now utilize more than 80 per cent renewable energy. Comparatively, the United States uses just 20 per cent renewable energy.
Renewables continue to dominate even in African economies with ample gas resources. In reality, there is no credible future scenario in which African gas use contributes even remotely meaningful to global pollution.
Even if Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding South Africa) increased its energy consumption overnight using exclusively gas, the new emissions would amount to just 0.62 per cent of global pollution. Africa has already adopted renewables, and the magnitude of its future gas use will remain insignificant globally.
Economic growth and energy transition drawbacks
While the West has nothing to gain by pressuring Africa on gas financing, rich-country approaches have significant drawbacks. A prohibition on gas finance would harm economic growth while delaying the energy transition.
The energy shift in Europe is all about substituting high-carbon sources like coal, oil, and gas with low-carbon replacements. However, in energy-scarce nations, the energy transition entails increasing supply to meet rising energy demand.
Gas remains necessary to back up wind and sunlight-dependent renewables in nations with significant undeveloped hydro- or geothermal potential. Across Africa, the switch from charcoal and wood to cleaner cooking energy will almost certainly necessitate the use of gas.
Hydrogen and other emerging green fuels have enormous possibilities. Nevertheless, businesses such as fertilizer manufacturing will need gas for the conceivable future. Blocking these growth routes in Africa in the name of climate policy is all misery and no benefit. The EU's stance on the EACOP, while on the other hand, funding a similar project in their backyard, sums up their hypocrisy.
SUPPLEMENT
Thursday, September 29, 2022
EUROPE GEOPOLITICAL SABOTAGE | BALTIC SEA PIPELINE LEAK : INTERIM CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT – A FRACTION OF THE POLLUTION GENERATED BY 250 MILLION INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE VEHICLES (ICEV's) IN (BLOC) : EUROPEAN UNION; (YEAR) 2020 AS AT: (SEPTEMBER 26, 2022)
NATO slams 'sabotage' of pipeline as environmental costs assessed
independence.ie, September 30, 2022 | Nato yesterday issued its strongest statement yet over the breaches in the Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea, describing the damage as the result of “deliberate, reckless, and irresponsible acts of sabotage”.
File Photo/Courtesy: Nord Stream Pipeline Leaks Appear to Be Result of Deliberate Act – Voice of America |
The underwater blasts have raised tensions in northern Europe, and stoked fears that the war in Ukraine could spill into the realm of vital energy infrastructure – as well as concerns over the environmental impact of the leaks.
Images released yesterday by the Swedish Coast Guard show a large mass of methane bubbles on the sea surface emanating from the leak in the two pipelines that make up Nord Stream 1 and a smaller mass above the single Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
The statement noted there are four leaks across the three pipelines, not three as had been widely reported.
The Nato statement said any deliberate attack against a member of the 30-country bloc’s infrastructure would “be met with a united and determined response,” echoing the EU’s warning the day before about a “robust and united response” to any attacks on energy infrastructure.
An EU official reiterated yesterday that the damage to the pipelines was “not a coincidence”.
Asked what Europe would do in response to the sabotage, the official said there was “a lot of co-ordination and discussion among the member states,” but declined to get into specifics.
Danish and Swedish authorities have ruled out natural causes for the explosions detected on Monday that caused the leaks.
The Swedish National Seismic Network (SNSN) registered two distinct blasts in the vicinity of the Danish island of Bornholm and said they were similar in nature to explosions from Swedish military exercises they periodically monitor.
“This looks like other blasts,” Bjorn Lund, director of the network, told reporters.
Cautioning that it was a preliminary estimate, he said the strength of the larger second blast was equivalent to 100-200kg of TNT.
The first was smaller and consequently harder to measure.
With the consensus among European leaders that sabotage was involved, suspicion is increasingly falling on Russia, which has used energy supplies as leverage against Europe since the invasion of Ukraine.
Russian Navy ships were spotted in the vicinity of the leaks on Monday and Tuesday, Western intelligence officials told CNN.
It is not clear if those ships were in any way involved with the pipeline explosions.
The Kremlin responded to the allegation, noting that there was a larger Nato presence in the area.
It is not uncommon for naval vessels from both Nato countries and Russia to be present in the strategically important Baltic Sea region.
The Kremlin has denied responsibility for the incident, suggesting yesterday that the incidents should be investigated as “an act of terrorism” and saying a co-ordinated international investigation was required, as Russia is the majority owner of both pipelines.
While experts say the resulting gas leak could amount to the largest-ever single release of methane gas into the atmosphere, it may not have been enough to have a major effect on climate change.
A worst-case calculation by the Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences in France, equated it to what comes from about one million cars in a year – so it is a comparatively minor increase on the amount currently generated by the 250 million cars in the EU in 2020.
SUPPLEMENT
IMPECCABLE FUNDING STRUCTURES FOR UGANDA, TANZANIA OIL & GAS PROJECTS FIRMLY SECURED TO WARRANT IMPLEMENTATION AS PER SCHEDULE
Uganda National Oil Company Dispels EACOP Project Funding Fears
File Photo/Courtesy: Proscovia Nabbanja, Chief Executive Officer, Uganda National Oil Company. |
File Photo/Courtesy: Participants at the International Uganda Oil & Gas Summit held at Kampala Serena Hotel. |
File Photo/Courtesy: Emmanuel Katongole, Board Chairman, Uganda National Oil Company (UNOC). |
Irene Bateebe, the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Energy & Mineral Development. |
File Photo/Courtesy: Hon. Amelia Kyambadde, Senior Presidential Advisor, Trade & Industry making her submission at the Summit. |
SUPPLEMENT
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION | LEAVE OUR OIL, GOES A PLACARD; UGANDAN STUDENTS PROTEST THE EU MEDDLING IN THEIR COUNTRY'S OIL & GAS PROJECTS
YouTube Video | NTV Uganda : Students demonstrate over EU resolution on East African Oil Pipeline ππΎ
SUPPLEMENT
UGANDA: CURRENT BUNYORO – KITARA KINGDOM REINCARNATES ITS DISDAIN FOR COLONIALISM AS IT ROARS AGAINST THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION CONDEMNING UGANDA, TANZANIA OIL & GAS PROJECTS
EACOP: Bunyoro Kingdom unhappy with EU Parliament resolution
SUPPLEMENT
Wednesday, September 28, 2022
UGANDA TOURISM BOARD (UTB) SET TO TAP THE COUNTRY'S DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS IN CHAMPIONING THE "EXPLORE UGANDA, THE PEARL OF AFRICA" CAMPAIGN ASPIRATIONS
UTB Partners with Embassies to Promote Destination Uganda
File Photo/Courtesy: Claire Mugabi, Marketing Manager, Uganda Tourism Board (UTB). |
File Photo/Courtesy: Hon. Frank Tumwebaze, Minister of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Republic of Uganda. |
SUPPLEMENT
Tuesday, September 27, 2022
AFRICA: THE CRADLE OF MAN IS UNANIMOUS AGAINST THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MEDDLING IN ITS AFFAIRS
Watchdog slams European Parliament over EACOP Resolution
File Image/Courtesy: Africa Union Headquarters, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
SUPPLEMENT
EUROPE CEDED TO NOVICES, PANDEMONIUM WRECKING HAVOC
"You are too young to advise me," Museveni tell off EU MPs
SUPPLEMENT
NO FUSS, NO HASSLE – SECURE, LUCRATIVE AND INCLUSIVE FINTECH ENABLED INVESTMENT; NOT A PRESERVE FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS :
Curated multi-stakeholder perspectives on sustainable wealth creation for equitable socio-ecomic Transformation What you need to know: https...
-
Curated multi-stakeholder perspectives on sustainable wealth creation for equitable socio-ecomic Transformation What you need to know: https...
-
Curated multi-stakeholder perspectives on sustainable wealth creation for equitable socio-ecomic Transformation What you need to know: https...
-
PSFU, KCCA and Uganda Baati Pen MoU to Enhance Climate Resilience in Uganda What you need to know about the UN-SDG-13 Courtesy/File Photo: (...